Inflating the tires, not reinventing the wheel ®

 

  • Home

  • Focused Instruction

  • Services

  • Resources

  • About Us

  • Blog

  • Contact us

  • Blog

  • More

    TESS

    Total Education Systems Support

    Close Reading: How Many Guiding Questions?

    February 28, 2015

    |

    Janae Tovar

    When I search the internet for Close Reading planning tools I wonder how many teachers are actually accessing these resources which are freely available online. I am curious, I think, because I am not sure how helpful educators actually find them. If they do, then wonderful! However when I find myself reviewing a 43 page document chock full of questions to consider in planning for a close reading of a text I become overwhelmed. Does it have to be like this? I don’t really think so. I think teachers, much like their students, benefit from a solid understanding of the whole before they scrutinize the parts.

     

    In Focused Instruction lessons, teachers are expected to make concepts and the connections between related attributes clear and visible with the use of concept maps. We have intentionally chosen five kinds of concept maps that we feel adequately address any relationship students will experience in the course of their education. The rationale for including these maps during the Key Ideas portion of the lesson is twofold.  

     

    The first reason is to give students a road map for what soon will be learned. The second reason is to be explicit about the relationships between what a student already knows and what will be the new learning. Oftentimes over the course of a unit a teacher will present the concept overall, then address the related parts and finally wrap up with a synthesis using the completed concept map as a whole. For example, when introducing the concepts of nouns and verbs, the map used could show that both are under the concept of “parts of speech”, or that the words that we use fall into different categories. This is based on the educational research that indicates we learn best whole-part-whole.

     

    When Carin Contreras and I began to unpack Close Reading with an eye for ultimately helping educators implement it in their classrooms, things really took off when we organized our understanding in a cycle map. It is with this concise summary of the relationship between multiple reads for different purposes that we were and are still able to consume additional resources on Close Reading.

     

     

    Text Dependent questions? Sure, I know how those support close reading. Our concept map shows us. Why and how many times am I reading a text? Easier to decide when I have the whole map in mind and not just vague notions of reading “slowly, deeply and more than once”. Class discussions about what has been read? Again, the map makes it clear how a rich discussion is possible amongst students when the successive rounds of reading, the parts, fit cohesively together to make a whole.

     

    Another reason why concept maps must be included in Focused Instruction lessons is that they allow students to determine the criteria for choosing only relevant information when learning and reading about a concept. Any given concept has an abundance of related information. We use a concept map to identify the most important attributes for our purposes. A second grade class doing research about Salmon know they are only looking for information about its habitat, its food and its babies because the tree map the teacher uses makes that clear. Everything else they can ignore, for now.

     

    The educators using the Close Reading concept map to plan are given the same support. They are still confronted with the overwhelming abundance of resources available to help them implement Close Reading, but they now have criteria for deciding what is most important for the text they have chosen.  We will always be faced with choices. Yes, even when new Language Arts curriculum is available. Educators using our Close Reading concept map, however, are able to efficiently identify relevant questions, helpful resources and appropriate performance tasks.

     

    Most planning tools clearly have the goal of helping teachers understand how to implement Close Reading in their classrooms. However the developers seem to forget the fact that educators already have so much to think about and plan for as a result of the Common Core, in addition to the myriad day to day demands of the job. If those who would support teachers would remember that, I doubt we would have any sort of instructional checklist with 32 “guiding questions”. In contrast, our goal at TESS is to keep educators in mind when developing efficient instructional planning tools. The task of implementing the Common Core, including Close Reading, is too big to give time to regularly answering 32 questions about anything. 

    Tags:

    close reading

    focused instruction

    application

    planning tools

    concept maps

    Please reload

    RSS Feed
    Join Our Newsletter
    Subscribe to Our Newsletter
    Featured Posts

    "But, where should we start?"

    December 6, 2016

    Multiple Initiatives, Multiple Rabbits Leave You Disappointed

    September 2, 2015

    "Who says? Compared to what?"

    February 1, 2017

    1/10
    Please reload

    Recent Posts

    Simple rules save lives and student motivation

    February 24, 2017

    "Who says? Compared to what?"

    February 1, 2017

    A simple idea, elegant execution

    January 17, 2017

    Why Students Achievement is Not Soaring: A Shocking Secret

    January 11, 2017

    "But, where should we start?"

    December 6, 2016

    Sorry, Not Sorry

    November 29, 2016

    Who said this was a good idea?

    October 25, 2016

    The order makes a difference, for words and for school improvement

    September 9, 2016

    Students avoiding the task? The solution might be smaller chunks

    August 17, 2016

    This too shall pass, be it muscle soreness or stress

    August 1, 2016

    Please reload

    Archive

    February 2017 (2)

    January 2017 (2)

    December 2016 (1)

    November 2016 (1)

    October 2016 (1)

    September 2016 (1)

    August 2016 (2)

    July 2016 (1)

    June 2016 (3)

    May 2016 (4)

    April 2016 (2)

    March 2016 (4)

    February 2016 (2)

    January 2016 (1)

    December 2015 (2)

    October 2015 (3)

    September 2015 (2)

    August 2015 (2)

    June 2015 (1)

    May 2015 (4)

    April 2015 (4)

    March 2015 (1)

    February 2015 (3)

    January 2015 (2)

    November 2014 (2)

    October 2014 (2)

    September 2014 (3)

    August 2014 (2)

    Please reload

    Search By Tags

    10000 hour rule

    15%

    21st century

    BOB time

    CCSS proficiencies

    Celebrate

    Choice Theory

    Dr. William Glasser

    Grit

    January to January

    Morale

    OWL time

    Professional Development

    Reflection

    SDC

    Symptoms

    TOTS

    Teacher Support

    Trainer of Trainers

    accountability

    accountability data

    analysis

    application

    art of teaching

    balanced approach

    be a student

    bike whisperer

    boss of the book

    buzz

    buzz words

    check for understanding

    chunking

    clarity

    classroom hacks

    close reading

    cognitive load

    collaboration

    collaborative learning

    common core

    complex tasks

    concept development

    concept maps

    critical thinking

    curriculum

    data and research

    dialog

    differentiation

    direct instruction

    discipline

    educational research

    educationese

    effective instruction

    enjoy the ride

    evaluate the research

    expensive purchase

    expert

    expert tip

    feedback

    first grade

    first instruction

    focus

    focused application

    focused instruction

    growth mindset

    homework

    humility

    implementation fatigue

    improving

    independent practice

    inflating the tires

    initiatives

    inspiration

    instruction

    instructional framework

    instructional leadership

    key ideas

    kwl

    language frame

    leadership

    leading with vision

    learning

    less is more

    lesson plan

    lesson steps

    lesson videos

    manageable chunks

    manipulatives

    meta-cognition

    modeling

    neomania

    new assessment

    new curriculum

    new name

    notes from the field

    parents

    planning

    planning tools

    prescription for success

    problem solving