Inflating the tires, not reinventing the wheel ®

 

  • Home

  • Focused Instruction

  • Services

  • Resources

  • About Us

  • Blog

  • Contact us

  • Blog

  • More

    TESS

    Total Education Systems Support

    Focused Instruction

    Checking for Understanding Never Goes Out of Style

    December 3, 2015

    |

    Gene Tavernetti

     

    We at TESS attempt to provide relevant, up to date information and opinions on topics that impact teaching and learning.   Our blog posts are inspired by events that transpired during recent work at school sties.  At several school sites, in different districts, the importance of checking for understanding as a means to collect formative data during lessons was a main topic of conversation.

     

    Our important is checking for understanding?  It is critical.  Therefore, we are reposting a blog on checking for understanding that was originally posted earlier this year. 

     

    Enjoy.

     

    ---

     

    “Checking for Understanding” has become a misunderstood educational catch phrase. The one thing that can be agreed upon is that “CFU” is checking if there is understanding of what has been taught. The misunderstanding lies in the relationship between the intention, the response, and the conclusion.

     

    First, there seems to be a disconnect between the purpose of asking Checking for Understanding questions and the manner in which the questions are posed.  Many teachers believe if they are posing questions they are checking for understanding.

     

    One purpose of checking for understanding is to determine which students do not know specific information and to determine exactly what they do not know.  Calling on a single student to answer a single question will not give a teacher the necessary data to determine which students do not know the information and what exactly the students do not know.

     

     A comment and question I have for teachers to help clarify the intent of checking for understanding is, “That is a great question.  Which students in your class need to know the answer to that question?”

     

    Inevitably the teacher answers, “Everyone needs to know the answer.” 

     

     Second, there is a deficit in the usual training associated with Checking for Understanding as it relates to the intent and purpose.  Most trainings focus on mechanics, i.e., selecting random students through the employment of playing cards, dice, popsicle sticks, equity cards, etc. And of course, now there are apps available for tablets and smart phones that teachers can use to randomize the selection of students to call on to answer a Checking for Understanding question.

     

    Mechanics are helpful, but using one of the above randomizing strategies does not guarantee the teacher is collecting the necessary data on who does not know, and what don’t they know.

     

    Here is checklist to help teachers become better at Checking for Understanding:

     

     

    • Write your Checking for Understanding questions in advance.  (Creating targeted questions and higher-level questions are difficult to think of during a lesson.)

    • Pose the question to the entire class before you call on any student to answer and know that if you call on one student, you’re only getting data on that ONE student.

    • Give think time before calling on a student.  You can allow silent think time, partner think-pair-share, group think time, etc. 

    • Recognize what understanding is essential for all students to know in order to do the independent work and what understanding will need to be synthesized and developed over time.   

    Remember, which students need to know the information in the lesson? ALL OF THEM!

    Tags:

    notes from the field

    check for understanding

    effective instruction

    student data

    Please reload

    RSS Feed
    Join Our Newsletter
    Subscribe to Our Newsletter
    Featured Posts

    "But, where should we start?"

    December 6, 2016

    Multiple Initiatives, Multiple Rabbits Leave You Disappointed

    September 2, 2015

    "Who says? Compared to what?"

    February 1, 2017

    1/10
    Please reload

    Recent Posts

    Simple rules save lives and student motivation

    February 24, 2017

    "Who says? Compared to what?"

    February 1, 2017

    A simple idea, elegant execution

    January 17, 2017

    Why Students Achievement is Not Soaring: A Shocking Secret

    January 11, 2017

    "But, where should we start?"

    December 6, 2016

    Sorry, Not Sorry

    November 29, 2016

    Who said this was a good idea?

    October 25, 2016

    The order makes a difference, for words and for school improvement

    September 9, 2016

    Students avoiding the task? The solution might be smaller chunks

    August 17, 2016

    This too shall pass, be it muscle soreness or stress

    August 1, 2016

    Please reload

    Archive

    February 2017 (2)

    January 2017 (2)

    December 2016 (1)

    November 2016 (1)

    October 2016 (1)

    September 2016 (1)

    August 2016 (2)

    July 2016 (1)

    June 2016 (3)

    May 2016 (4)

    April 2016 (2)

    March 2016 (4)

    February 2016 (2)

    January 2016 (1)

    December 2015 (2)

    October 2015 (3)

    September 2015 (2)

    August 2015 (2)

    June 2015 (1)

    May 2015 (4)

    April 2015 (4)

    March 2015 (1)

    February 2015 (3)

    January 2015 (2)

    November 2014 (2)

    October 2014 (2)

    September 2014 (3)

    August 2014 (2)

    Please reload

    Search By Tags

    10000 hour rule

    15%

    21st century

    BOB time

    CCSS proficiencies

    Celebrate

    Choice Theory

    Dr. William Glasser

    Grit

    January to January

    Morale

    OWL time

    Professional Development

    Reflection

    SDC

    Symptoms

    TOTS

    Teacher Support

    Trainer of Trainers

    accountability

    accountability data

    analysis

    application

    art of teaching

    balanced approach

    be a student

    bike whisperer

    boss of the book

    buzz

    buzz words

    check for understanding

    chunking

    clarity

    classroom hacks

    close reading

    cognitive load

    collaboration

    collaborative learning

    common core

    complex tasks

    concept development

    concept maps

    critical thinking

    curriculum

    data and research

    dialog

    differentiation

    direct instruction

    discipline

    educational research

    educationese

    effective instruction

    enjoy the ride

    evaluate the research

    expensive purchase

    expert

    expert tip

    feedback

    first grade

    first instruction

    focus

    focused application

    focused instruction

    growth mindset

    homework

    humility

    implementation fatigue

    improving

    independent practice

    inflating the tires

    initiatives

    inspiration

    instruction

    instructional framework

    instructional leadership

    key ideas

    kwl

    language frame

    leadership

    leading with vision

    learning

    less is more

    lesson plan

    lesson steps

    lesson videos

    manageable chunks

    manipulatives

    meta-cognition

    modeling

    neomania

    new assessment

    new curriculum

    new name

    notes from the field

    parents

    planning